104adt

104adt104adt104adt

104adt

104adt104adt104adt
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Case Study
  • Your Reality
  • Workflows
  • Educate
  • Assist
  • Monitoring Details
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Knowledge Tests & Surveys

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Case Study from two perspectives

Patient Perspective – True story 6/2024

Mid-June, my 88 year old mother began having significant cognitive issues.  Emergency response was called. She was taken to a nearby hospital for  treatment. She was admitted, received an initial assessment, a battery of blood  work, a CRT, and a MRI. She was admitted to the hospital for several days, receiving  repeats of all initial testing and more tests including a lumbar puncture. Days later she was discharged after no root cause could be determined. Follow-up psychiatric care was suggested as was  on-site nursing visits, occupational therapy and physical therapy.


IT Perspective

I am a retired IT Director with many years in healthcare, specifically Radiology. I look at events through a different lens because I know all the complexity of what must be  connected and working 100% to allow clinical staff to address patient care. My perspective became personal as I considered all the resources that come into  play. Below is a partial list of obvious and not-so-obvious touchpoints.


In the ER Department

* Was the admitting workstation on-line and functional as well as the laser  printer used to print documents and armbands.

* My mother’s demographic information was entered, and insurance verified.

* Was the HL7 messaging application fully on-line to receive  demographic information   

from the EMR and send orders to both the  lab and radiology applications?

* Was there a HL7 interface to an outside insurance provider so real- time verification 

could be performed.

* Was there any kind of interface between my mother’s primary care  physician’s EMR and the hospital EMR. She is allergic to many drugs  so hoping her allergy list could be transferred, otherwise I would need to manually obtain the list.


In the hospital

* Was the HL7 interface between the lab and the EMR working so her lab  results could quickly be available to all clinical staff In the medical imaging department

* Two orders for imaging were received. Orders could be received into a RIS,  into an intelligent workflow solution, or maybe into another application. Were  all of the application servers on-line, expected applications running, and  were they able to receive orders. These servers could be on-site, at a colo  location, or in the cloud. I did not care, nor would any clinician care.

* Was the application that provides modality worklists connected and  working? A 

modality worklist is just that, a list of patients to be scanned. A  worklist is critical so the    

tech does not have to enter information manually  which can create errors and delays.

* Studies were completed, and images were sent to one, maybe several  applications. I 

can name many applications that come into play, not to  mention the physical 

components to make sure the images were available to  a Radiologist. Was the speed 

of image transfer as expected throughout the  maze of connections? Was one or 

several AI applications used as part of the Radiologist’s diagnosis? Was the 

Radiologist reading workstation connected  and working as expected, knowing the 

workstation could be at the hospital,  at the Radiologist’s home, or literally across the 

country. Were all servers tied  to the voice recognition system in play? The touchpoints 

are massive.


I’m reminded of what a Radiologist said to me many years ago… If there is a  problem 

IT needs to know about it before I do…


Summary

I have identified only a small number of resources and workflows that come into  play when treating patients. In many environments resources must be connected  7x24x365. When there is a problem, timely notification must be sent to the  appropriate teams and individuals, so remediation can begin. Time is of the  essence.


PRTG’s solution can monitor all the touchpoints I’ve listed above using out-of-the- box components without ever installing a software agent on any workstation or clinical device. 


Proactive monitoring in a healthcare setting is much different than monitoring other  environments. It is patient care. It will affect you and your family at some point, and I  sincerely hope your medical environment has done all they can to ensure all is well.

Copyright © 2025 104adt.com - All Rights Reserved.

  • Contact
  • Secure Content

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept